We continue with our series of articles penned by one attorney, an MD, JD, giving you a view of the world through a malpractice plaintiff attorney’s eyes. In this article, the author addresses “Assumption of risk versus informed consent..” This attorney is a seasoned veteran. The series includes a number of pearls on how to stay out of harm’s way. While I do not necessarily agree with 100% of the details of every article, I think the messages are salient, on target, and fully relevant. Please give us your feedback – and let us know if you find the series helpful.
“The patient signed a consent. He understood the risks. Why can he sue me now??? Why can’t my lawyer just present the signed consent and get this case dismissed?”
You have probably heard it from colleagues. You may have even asked it yourself.
The subtext is a reference to an affirmative defense (a defense the defendant must plead and prove) called “assumption of risk.”
What is assumption of risk as a legal defense?