Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD

Your deposition is your best chance to lose your case before it has hardly even started.

That is because it is actually a job interview. Both the plaintiff’s attorney and your own attorney are interviewing you for the position of “defendant” and each wants to see how well you will perform in that role.

In fact, although you may think that the plaintiff’s attorney is the one you have to impress, it is actually your own attorney who matters more to you at this point in your case.

Read more

by “Dr. J.D.”

Allegations of communication failure account for a progressively increasing proportion of malpractice claims.

This is partially the result of the fact that more diagnostic studies and examinations are being performed and expectations of timeliness in reporting have increased with improved technology, but in the day-to-day working reality of consulting physicians communication usually fails for same simple reasons that it has in the past – difficulty in reaching the target recipient, distraction by other work and, frankly, annoyance that leads to giving up too soon

All of these will, of course, be exacerbated in an environment of increased volume and shorter turn-around times. It is therefore necessary to have a systematic approach to turn to.

Let’s therefore look at some of the essential principles involved in the communication of critical findings and some reasonable protections against falling into liability.

1. Duty

Although radiologists and pathologists are the physicians most likely to come across an unexpected finding and to have to communicate it to an absent referrer, the responsibility to communicate appropriately applies to all consultants.

It is a black letter piece of carved-in-stone law – as well as an absolute of medical ethics – that a consultant physician’s duty to communicate a critical finding is not satisfied merely by creating and signing a report or a chart note.

It is not satisfied until that information is in the hands of someone who can act on it definitively enough to relieve that physician of his or her obligation to communicate it.

Read more

by Michael J. Sacopulos

“I’m on jury duty. God help me.” For those of us who have been on jury duty, this thought has probably passed through our head. Perhaps some of us have even muttered it beneath our breath when we received the notice to report into jury duty. But most people know enough not to tweet or write a Facebook post about serving or a jury. Now, enter a Kentucky juror who did exactly that. Her friend then responded “They’re guilty…whatever it is, they’re guilty”.

Earlier this year, this Kentucky juror was sitting on a medical malpractice case. The case involved a newborn child that had suffered a catastrophic and irreversible brain injury due to the umbilical cord being wrapped around his neck. The child lived for 39 days before life support was removed. He died. According to the Kentucky Trial Court Review a $1,183,638 verdict was returned. Thereafter, the hospital sought a new trial/mistrial based on a Facebook posting by a juror.

Read more

This week newspapers reported assorted medical specialty societies are recommending doctors perform fewer tests and procedures. They also urged patients to question the value of these services, if offered.

Some of the over-ordered tests:

1. Routine EKG at routine physical
2. MRI for recent back pain
3. Imaging studies for patient suffering from simple headaches
4. Antibiotics for sinusitis.

 
Two points:

“These all sound reasonable, but don’t forget that every person you’re looking after is unique,” said Dr. Eric Topol, chief academic officer of Scripps Health, a health system based in San Diego, adding that he worried that the group’s advice would make tailoring care to individual patients harder. “This kind of one-size-fits-all approach can be a real detriment to good care.”

Read more