Massive Judgment Against Florida HCA Hospital

Medical Justice solves doctors' complex medico-legal problems.

Learn how we help doctors with...

Michael J. Sacopulos, Esq.

A jury in Jacksonville, Florida entered a $178 million judgment against physicians and an HCA owned hospital for a gastric bypass procedure that went horribly awry.

In 2007 following laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, the patient, Clay Chandler, suffered respiratory failure and was admitted to critical care. He experienced a perforated bowel which required additional surgery and was in a comatose state for several weeks. He presented at trial with an inability to walk, feed himself, speak intelligently and was blind.

The plaintiffs introduced evidence that the Chandler’s surgeon did not meet the standards of the American Society of Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. This was the designation at the HCA facility where Chandler underwent his initial bypass surgery. The plaintiff’s attorney claimed that Chandler was fraudulently informed as to his surgeons experience in performing bariatric procedures. Apparently, the jury agreed with the plaintiff’s position.

The jury verdict of $178 million was so large as to attract the attention of the Wall Street Journal. Reports indicate that HCA plans to appeal the judgment. Despite the fact that this case has been pending for years, the litigation will continue. The ending to this sad story remains unclear and distant. What is clear is that this judgment will have an impact on other pending medical malpractice litigation in Florida and beyond.

2 thoughts on “Massive Judgment Against Florida HCA Hospital”

  1. This is a complete misrepresentation of this case. F minus. This was just a case of gross enterprise negligence and if there is a point to the center of excellence issue, it shows the extra liability problem created by over marketing safety in a culture of dumbing down the medical profession. The guideline movement can never add legitimacy to mediocrity. Congratulations to the corporate defense bar for promoting this nonsense. Only a corporate defense lawyer would not understand this.

    Real quality is wanting. Industry claims of quality will continue to further highlight incompetence. the false quality movement is going to be great for plaintiffs lawyers. the bloodfest is just beginning. Even without this idiotic form of marketing, the negligence at this hospital was across the board obscene.

  2. If attorneys were held to the same standards of practice which the courts and plaintiffs attorneys apply to physicians, what a different world it would be! I suspect half would be quickly disbarred.

    Plaintiffs attorneys commonly use hired gun expert witnesses who they know are willing to lie about the standard of care. It’s amazing how self-righteousness and hypocrisy abounds in the legal profession.

Comments are closed.

Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD
Chief Executive Officer & Founder

Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD is a board-certified neurosurgeon and lawyer. In the process of conceiving, funding, developing, and growing Medical Justice, Dr. Segal has established himself as one of the country's leading authorities on medical malpractice issues, counterclaims, and internet-based assaults on reputation.

Subscribe to Dr. Segal's weekly newsletter »
Latest Posts from Our Blog