“Can Medical Justice solve my problem?” Click here to review recent consultations…
all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…- Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
- Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
- Just received board complaint…
- Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
- Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
- DEA showed up to my office…
- Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
- My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
- My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
- How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
- How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
- I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
- Hospital wants to fire me…
- Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
- Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
- Patient’s results are not what was expected…
- Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
- Just received notice of intent to sue…
- Just received summons for meritless case…
- Safely responding to negative online reviews…
RaDonda Vaught worked as a nurse at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 2015 and January 2018. If you follow medical news outlets, you are likely familiar with Vaught’s case. If you are not, we’ll bring you up to speed. The case’s outcomes will impact everyone who works in healthcare – not just nurses.
In December 2017, Vaught cared for an elderly patient named Charlene Murphey (75). Vanderbilt scheduled Murphey for an imaging study. Murphey was prescribed Versed, a sedative, to calm her. Vaught grabbed vecuronium by mistake and injected the paralytic agent into the patient, killing her.
Vaught admitted her mistake to the Tennessee Board of Nursing during a 2021 hearing. Vaught described herself as “complacent” and “distracted” by a younger colleague while she retrieved medication from the medication dispensing system. Vaught took ownership of her fatal mistake but insisted that the blame should not rest entirely on her shoulders.
We’ve enclosed a link to the hearing below – her testimony lasts around three minutes.
Following her testimony, the Tennessee Board of Nursing revoked her license. This is where this story would normally end; but if it did, there’d be little to discuss. This is only the beginning.
Following her hearing, Vaught was charged with the reckless homicide and felony abuse of an impaired adult for the death of her patient. Really.
Medical errors rarely result in jail time. Fatal errors are traditionally the domain of the licensing boards and civil courts. Nurses and doctors followed the case closely. The case’s outcome could shift the precedent towards criminalizing medical errors.
Vaught’s defense depended on her use of an electronic medication cabinet. The medical cabinet (and Vaught’s need to manually override the device to extract prescribed medication) played a critical role in her story. Case documents describe the fatal event and the moments preceding it.
VAUGHT was working as the “Help All “nurse; she was comfortable with that position and knew what was expected of her in that position. She was familiar with the Accudose machines and how to access the medication held within the machines. She had worked December 25, 2017 (Christmas Day) and December 26, 2017, on the 7:00 am to 7:00 pm shift. She stated she was not overtired. VAUGHT stated they were not understaffed, the NICU is always staffed due to the acuity of the patients. VAUGHT said the NICU is never shorthanded.
She had a new orientation employee with her, Darren, but she told the night nurse that assigned him to work with her that she (VAUGHT) was comfortable having him with her as the Help All nurse. When VAUGHT went to the Accudose machine to pull the medication to take to CHARLENE MURPHEY, she couldn’t find Versed in MURPHEY’S profile. She checked the Medication Administration Record (MAR) in a different computer and found the order was there for Versed. Since she couldn’t find the Versed in the Accudose system, she overrode the system, typed in VE, and selected the first medication (Vecuronium Bromide) in the list. The system asked for a reason for the override, but she couldn’t recall what reason she selected.
VAUGHT looked at the back of the vial and saw that it needed to be reconstituted but never looked at the front of the vial. She went down with Darren to the PET Scan Unit and found MURPHEY. She verbally verified who MURPHEY was but could not find a computer to scan the medication. She reconstituted the vial, gave MURPHEY one (1) milligram; and left her with the PET Scan Unit tech. After administering the medication, she never scanned it to put in into the medical record. After the code was called on MURPHEY and MURPHEY was brought back to the NICU from the PET Scan Unit, VAUGHT informed Dr. Neeley and Lindsey Trantham, Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, that she had given Vecuronium Bromide to MURPHEY.
Their response was “I’m so sorry”. Misty Ashby, Unit Manager, advised her not to scan medication, the MAR would note it. VAUGHT admitted she had administered Versed before, but never Vecuronium Bromide. VAUGHT admitted to being distracted by talking to Darren about the Swallow Study they were going to do. VAUGHT admitted she shouldn’t have been distracted with something other than “meds” at the time of the dispensing. VAUGHT admitted she shouldn’t have overrode the system though it is common to do so. VAUGHT admitted it struck her as a little odd that she had to reconstitute the medication.
VAUGHT didn’t recall anything on the vial to alert her, but she said she should have recognized the difference. VAUGHT admitted she was distracted. She stated she should have paid attention and shouldn’t have overrode the medication because it wasn’t an emergency. VAUGHT stated she should have called the pharmacy to check the status on the order for Versed. VAUGHT admitted she was thinking, “I probably just killed a patient”; “What did I do to this patient if I didn’t kill her?”; “What kind of life changings did I just put this patient and her family through?”; “It’s a horrible situation”.
VAUGHT admitted she had “fucked” up.
With the case facts in the background, we return to the criminal charges.
If you follow the news, you know the outcome: The jury convicted her. RaDonda expressed relief the ordeal was over.
The ruling is already affecting nurse morale. One nurse quit less than five days after the ruling, citing RaDonda’s conviction as the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Professional societies like the American Nurses Association and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses are also speaking out.
Many nurses are anxious RaDonda’s conviction sets an ugly precedent. Linda Aiken, a nursing and sociology professor at the University of Pennsylvania, believes the court’s ruling discourages nurses from discussing potential mistakes in a public setting.
“One thing that everybody agrees on is it’s going to have a dampening effect on the reporting of errors or near misses, which then has a detrimental effect on safety,” Aiken said. “The only way you can really learn about errors in these complicated systems is to have people say, ‘Oh, I almost gave the wrong drug because …'”
“Well, nobody is going to say that now.”
Easy to understand why. Calling the death of 75-year-old patient Charlene Murphey a “terrible, terrible mistake,” a Tennessee judge sentenced Vaught to 3 years of supervised probation on Friday, May 13.
What do you think? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Medical Justice provides consultations to doctors facing medico-legal obstacles. We have solutions for doctor-patient conflicts, unwarranted demands for refunds, online defamation (patient review mischief), meritless litigation, and a gazillion other issues. We also provide counsel specific to COVID-19. If you are navigating a medico-legal obstacle, visit our booking page to schedule a consultation – or use the tool shared below.“Can Medical Justice solve my problem?” Click here to review recent consultations…
all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…- Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
- Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
- Just received board complaint…
- Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
- Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
- DEA showed up to my office…
- Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
- My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
- My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
- How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
- How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
- I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
- Hospital wants to fire me…
- Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
- Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
- Patient’s results are not what was expected…
- Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
- Just received notice of intent to sue…
- Just received summons for meritless case…
- Safely responding to negative online reviews…
Criminalize medical errors and pretty soon no one will be going into healthcare fields.
Virtue signaling on steroids.
I think we can see an automatic problem with the ability to over-ride the Accudose system in any case where a nurse or person administering a drug cannot find a record of the medication in the repository of the machine. This is automatically a problem. (Pun intended)
Years ago, I saw a TV movie of some actors framing our first Mars colonizers. In one of the episodes a botanist was having a kind of fugue state, where he imagined himself in his own (Earth) backyard. He was depressed and was probably not a good match to be a first colonist. In the TV movie he easily unlatched the door and walked directly out into Mars, depressurizing the entire colony and causing hundreds of deaths.
I could NOT understand why or how a simple door latch would be allowed on an exit door of a Mars colony habitat that would allow for a catastrophic depressurization?
Nor can I understand how unreliable the Accudose system is to allow someone to withdraw a dose of a dangerous muscle relaxant used mainly by anesthesiologists (or executioners).
Nobody is asking the question: “How and why would an automatic drug dosing system be allowed to be easily over-rode?” Why no warning system for dangerous drugs? Who designed this contraption? Wasn’t an accident just waiting to happen?
How is it that it takes an elderly retired DPM to realize this? Do they want to send an employee to prison for design incompetence? What about the people who engineered this?
Michael M. Rosenblatt, DPM
The situation described, substituting vecuronium for versed has happened several times over the decades. The newspaper article about the trial providing another tid bit of information… the pharmacy dispensing machine had recently had some software updates.
As a retired anesthesiologist, what should happen, given that critical event analysis always shows that there is more than one factor involved in these circumstances is as follows:
1)Vecuronium should simply not be available in any environment other than the OR and the adult ICU. I highly question the need for it in the ER, and frown on ER physicians using it to facilitate intubation in emergency circumstances, because they do not know if they can intubate a patient until the carefully examine the airway and know in advance that they can intubate the patient. In the OR we have all equipment immediately at hand to support an airway including the anesthesia machine. ERs seldom have all that we have in the OR. So restrict the drug to only those places where it needs to be.
2)Overrides for vecuronium should never be permitted under any circumstances. This is a matter of programming the machine.
3)Any override if it is decide that this is necessary MUST have a pharmacist involved to authorize the override with direct verbal communication between pharmacist and nurse. If the pharmacist is at home, then the pharmacist on call MUST be contacted to discuss this override before it is authorized.
4)Only fully authorized physicians should have the ability to order vecuronium in the first place.
5)Versed should be prescribed by its generic name midazolam. Requesting nurses must be trained to get it from the pharmacy dispensing machine by its generic name.
6)Every vial of vecuronium brand name Norcuron should have a pharmacy label on it indicating that it is for paralyzing patients and is not for sedation, or for routine use.
7)Ongoing pharmacy education of the nursing staff in regard to medication errors should be done routinely because nurses get precious little pharmacologic training in nursing school.
8)The next issue in this case was a failure to monitor. Any time any anesthetic drug, like versed or vecuronium is used, the patient by protocol must be on monitors for pulse oximetry, ECG, End tidal CO2 and non invasive blood pressure. This monitors have been required for decades in the OR and recovery room and are part of the anesthesia standard of care. If these monitors had been in place, a decreased O2 Sat and End tidal CO2 would have been detected BEFORE the patient arrested.
9)There was also a failure to resuscitate. The patient should have been treated with a bag valve mask Ambu bag and mask so that the patient could have been ventilated until they recovered from the vecuronium whether naturally over time or with a reversal agent such as neostigmine and atropine.
10)The hospital chose to put all of the blame on the nurse, and ignored all of the other critical event analysis information.
I put many if not most of these steps in place in the facilities where I chaired departments.
Safety is a culture. It is multi layered. It requires figuring out in advance how people will screw things up and preventing it by putting multiple different safety protocols in place. In this case it is possible that they had those protocols in place BEFORE the pharmacy machine software updates! But the hospital not stepping up and admitting its fault in this case, permits a possible culture of blame and not safety to continue to exist.
Finally the criminalization of medicine on multiple different fronts, not just this one, contributes to the enormous stress that clinicians endure every day. It is flat out wrong, doesn’t protect society and leads to a further decrease in those who leave the medical and nursing professions prematurely. Malpractice cases are bad enough. This is worse. This was, by description a nurse that was otherwise well trained, was supervising a trainee, and now after one terrible mistake, she will never work as a nurse again, with a felony conviction on her record. Even though she is going to go on probation, and not prison, she will never work in any field requiring a license, with a felony conviction ever again. The entire Vanderbilt hospital system failed her (IMHO), and failed the patient, by not creating a secure enough safety environment. This exact drug swap has happened before, and will happen again, because the steps that I have outlined have never been put in place. across the healthcare systems in the US, though they should be.