Your collection agency might hurt your medical malpractice defense

Medical Justice solves doctors' complex medico-legal problems.

Learn how we help doctors with...

Michael J. Sacopulos, Esq.

Several months ago the South Carolina Appellate Court issued a scary opinion (Burke V. AnMed Health). A standard medical malpractice case had come before a trial court in South Carolina. Prior to trial, the defense attorney asked that prospective jurors who owed bad debts and judgments to the healthcare provider be excluded from the jury. The trial court Judge did exclude several potential jurors who had judgments against them by the healthcare provider, but the Judge refused to excuse several jurors who owed debts to the medical provider. One $250,000 judgment later, the defendant appealed the matter to the South Carolina Court of Appeals.

The South Carolina Court of Appeals refused to establish a bright line rule that would categorically exclude any juror who had been referred to a collection agency resulting from a failure to pay a debt to one of the parties in litigation. The Appeals Court also confirmed the lower Court’s judgment of the $250,000 award to plaintiffs. This means that in South Carolina, and potentially other states, your former patient that you turned over to a collection agency may be sitting in judgment on a medical malpractice claim against you.

I am not suggesting that medical providers give up pursuing accounts that are owed to their practice. However, this recent ruling out of South Carolina does underscore the importance of how debts should be collected. It seems that if a medical provider had used a law firm and obtained a judgment against the debtor, that debtor would be excluded from a jury pool. Collection agencies typically attempt to recover the funds by telephone and letter campaigns as well as the use of credit bureaus. For the sake of defending against the medical malpractice claim, it would seem that you are better to turn past due accounts over to a collection law firm rather than a collection agency. Lawyers that practice in this area of the law typically are members of the National Association of Retail Collection Attorneys.

2 thoughts on “Your collection agency might hurt your medical malpractice defense”

  1. Good to know. Chasing money is a nightmare. But what to do other than losing money and writing it off. Handling care with grace and honesty upfront is best. Law firms will also take a alot from a practice too I am sure. Doctors in practice are up against a wall and the opportunists are around.. it is hard…to decide really what to do.

  2. I wanted to update everyone about how to pursue debts in court. You actually do not need an attorney. We have discussed this throughout the American College of Medical Practice Executives and found that there are some rules to follow (by the way, I agree with Michael about not using a collection agency):

    1. Be realistic- go after smaller money. We limit our practices to debts under $500
    2. Meet with an attorney on how to file in Small Claims Court
    3. If you have an educated manager, they can do all this for you
    4. File in bulk. File all of your small claims and request 1 day for the hearings
    5. Most people will not show up for the hearings, and you will be awarded a judgement.

    All you paid, some minor court fees (which you attach to the claim). You may have to pay for the research if you want wage garnishment, which is applicable in a judgement.

    Erik

Comments are closed.

Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD
Chief Executive Officer & Founder

Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD is a board-certified neurosurgeon and lawyer. In the process of conceiving, funding, developing, and growing Medical Justice, Dr. Segal has established himself as one of the country's leading authorities on medical malpractice issues, counterclaims, and internet-based assaults on reputation.

Subscribe to Dr. Segal's weekly newsletter »
Latest Posts from Our Blog