Medical Justice provides free consultations to doctors facing medico-legal obstacles. We have solutions for doctor-patient conflicts, unwarranted demands for refunds, online defamation (patient review mischief), meritless litigation, and a gazillion other issues. We also provide counsel specific to COVID-19. If you are navigating a medico-legal obstacle, visit our booking page to schedule a free consultation – or use the tool shared below.

"Can Medical Justice solve my problem?" Click here to review recent consultations...

We’ve been protecting doctors from medico-legal threats since 2001. We’ve seen it all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…

  • Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
  • Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
  • Just received board complaint…
  • Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
  • Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
  • DEA showed up to my office…
  • Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
  • My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
  • My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
  • How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
  • How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
  • I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
  • Hospital wants to fire me…
  • Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
  • Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
  • Patient’s results are not what was expected…
  • Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
  • Just received notice of intent to sue…
  • Just received summons for meritless case…
  • Safely responding to negative online reviews…

We challenge you to supply us with a medico-legal obstacle we haven’t seen before. Know you are in good hands. Schedule your consultation below – or click here to visit our booking page.

Before and after photos are the lifeblood of an aesthetic surgeon’s marketing plan.

Nothing is as effective as a full library of high-quality before-and-after pictures. Particularly those showing substantive change. And a natural look.

These photos are considered “protected health information” governed by HIPAA and state privacy laws.

You need the patient’s authorization to post these photos. And such authorization needs to be more than one sentence that says something like “I give consent to Dr. Segal to use before-and-after photos for medical records, educational purposes, and marketing.”

To comply with HIPAA, several ingredients are needed:

What type of photos will be used? What body parts? Everything? Non-intimate body parts? Face, which is identifiable? Breasts, which are theoretically not identifiable? What if the patient’s breasts have unique tattoos or freckling patterns? (Yes, those have served as legal arguments by plaintiff’s attorneys noting their clients were “outed” even though the surgeon promised no one would learn the identity). So, be specific. The more specific the description of the photos, the better defense you will have should the authorization be questioned.

Next, the document needs a time frame for when the authorization will be in force. It can be “forever.” But it needs to be spelled out.

For example:

“Dr. Segal need not approach me again for authorization to use these photos, videos, and/or digital images unless the usage differs from that listed above and this authorization will remain in place indefinitely unless I ask Dr. Segal to terminate use of these photos, videos and/or digital images, in writing and communicated to Dr. Segal.”

Next, there is a statement that HIPAA requires for authorizations:

Note that once photos, videos, and/or digital images are used for any of the authorized purposes above, that information may no longer be protected by HIPAA.

Duh.

Once something is on the Internet, it will likely stay on the Internet somewhere forever.

Next, one cannot make signing such an authorization conditional on treatment:

“Providing authorization is entirely voluntary and will not affect our commitment to treatment by our practice.”

Patients are free to revoke their authorization at any time, for any reason, or no reason at all. They just need to communicate that, typically in writing, to the practice. Once a patient asks to take their photos down, just do it. Informing patients of their right to revoke their authorization was addressed above:

“…this authorization will remain in place indefinitely unless I ask Dr. Segal to terminate use of these photos, videos, and/or digital images, in writing and communicated to Dr. Segal.”

Finally, patients should sign off on where their pictures will be used.

        •  Medical purposes related to case
        •  Scientific purposes, including seminars and medical articles
        •  Digital or printed materials for patients to view in the office(s)
        •  Digital or printed materials to be included in our practice’s newsletter to be sent to current or prospective patients
        •  Digital images to be included in our practice website
        •  Digital images to be uploaded to the broader Internet to be viewed by the public

The more specific the authorization, the more defensible the authorization, assuming the patient later expresses shock and dismay that you did precisely what they agreed to.

One additional process issue. I do not believe it is smart practice to have the patient agree to post their before-and-after pictures at the patient intake. At that early stage, you have not developed a substantive doctor-patient relationship. The patient likely just signed a gazillion documents. They could later argue they didn’t know what they were signing. Plus, there are plenty of patients who would freak out if they knew you planned to post their before and after pictures online without any discussion.

In sum, authorization to use before and after photos need to be a formal document. Having a well-crafted authorization form protects you. You want to have it in place before there’s a problem. As they say about parachutes. If you don’t have a parachute when you need it, you’ll never need one again.

What do you think? And let us know if you are interested in receiving a copy of our model Photo Authorization Template.

Medical Justice provides free consultations to doctors facing medico-legal obstacles. We have solutions for doctor-patient conflicts, unwarranted demands for refunds, online defamation (patient review mischief), meritless litigation, and a gazillion other issues. We also provide counsel specific to COVID-19. If you are navigating a medico-legal obstacle, visit our booking page to schedule a free consultation – or use the tool shared below.

"Can Medical Justice solve my problem?" Click here to review recent consultations...

We’ve been protecting doctors from medico-legal threats since 2001. We’ve seen it all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…

  • Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
  • Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
  • Just received board complaint…
  • Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
  • Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
  • DEA showed up to my office…
  • Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
  • My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
  • My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
  • How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
  • How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
  • I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
  • Hospital wants to fire me…
  • Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
  • Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
  • Patient’s results are not what was expected…
  • Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
  • Just received notice of intent to sue…
  • Just received summons for meritless case…
  • Safely responding to negative online reviews…

We challenge you to supply us with a medico-legal obstacle we haven’t seen before. Know you are in good hands. Schedule your consultation below – or click here to visit our booking page.

Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD

Chief Executive Officer and Founder

Dr. Jeffrey Segal, Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Medical Justice, is a board-certified neurosurgeon. Dr. Segal is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons; the American College of Legal Medicine; and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. He is also a member of the North American Spine Society. In the process of conceiving, funding, developing, and growing Medical Justice, Dr. Segal has established himself as one of the country’s leading authorities on medical malpractice issues, counterclaims, and internet-based assaults on reputation. Dr. Segal was a practicing neurosurgeon for approximately ten years, during which time he also played an active role as a participant on various state-sanctioned medical review panels designed to decrease the incidence of meritless medical malpractice cases. Dr. Segal holds a M.D. from Baylor College of Medicine, where he also completed a neurosurgical residency. Dr. Segal served as a Spinal Surgery Fellow at The University of South Florida Medical School. He is a member of Phi Beta Kappa as well as the AOA Medical Honor Society. Dr. Segal received his B.A. from the University of Texas and graduated with a J.D. from Concord Law School with highest honors. In 2000, he co-founded and served as CEO of DarPharma, Inc, a biotechnology company in Chapel Hill, NC, focused on the discovery and development of first-of-class pharmaceuticals for neuropsychiatric disorders. Dr. Segal is also a partner at Byrd Adatto, a national business and health care law firm. Byrd Adatto was selected as a Best Law Firm in the 2023 edition of the “Best Law Firms” list by U.S. News – Best Lawyers. With over 50 combined years of experience in serving doctors, dentists, and other providers, Byrd Adatto has a national pedigree to address most legal issues that arise in the business and practice of medicine.