Visit our booking page to schedule a consultation – or use the tool shared below.
“Can Medical Justice solve my problem?” Click here to review recent consultations…
all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…
- Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
- Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
- Just received board complaint…
- Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
- Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
- DEA showed up to my office…
- Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
- My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
- My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
- How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
- How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
- I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
- Hospital wants to fire me…
- Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
- Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
- Patient’s results are not what was expected…
- Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
- Just received notice of intent to sue…
- Just received summons for meritless case…
- Safely responding to negative online reviews…
We challenge you to supply us with a medico-legal obstacle we haven’t seen before. Know you are in good hands. Schedule your consultation below – or click here to visit our booking page.
We continue with our series of general educational articles penned by one attorney, an MD, JD, giving you a view of the world through a malpractice plaintiff attorney’s eyes. This attorney is a seasoned veteran. The series includes a number of pearls on how to stay out of harm’s way. While I do not necessarily agree with 100% of the details of every article, I think the messages are salient, on target, and fully relevant. Please give us your feedback – and let us know if you find the series helpful.
Most doctors fear the destructive effect of a report to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).
Given the expanded scope of the NPDB and the reliance that state licensing boards, privilege committees at hospitals, and payors place on it, that concern is well-placed.
A physician involved in a situation that may trigger or has triggered a report should seek expert counsel AND be an informed client who gets the most out of that representation.
Let’s have a look at what you need your lawyer to do for you to either prevent a report entirely or to blunt its impact.
- Medical malpractice litigation
The law that established the NPDB states that payment in settlement of a medical malpractice claim does not create a presumption that medical malpractice in fact occurred. It merely notes that money changed hands. But, states still give considerable attention to NPDB reports in setting their own disciplinary standards and may institute proceedings based on a single large award or an aggregate of smaller ones.
You therefore want the lawyer defending you in a malpractice action to first be realistic with you about your case. You want to avoid pushing for litigation to verdict in a case that you will likely lose big-time rather than settling for a smaller sum or being too eager to settle for a low value without taking into account other awards on your record.
If your attorney opines you will likely lose, there are some alternatives he can pursue which may limit its NPDB effect.
Ask your attorney to see if he can craft a settlement low enough for you to cover it personally. That is not reportable to the NPDB because it would not be a payment by a third party on your behalf. This makes sense if the sum is less than $10,000. This makes little sense if the amount is $100,000.
If that is not feasible, an alternative is to have your hospital or group, if they are your co-defendants, cover your share of an award. Once the hospital or group pays, you’d be dismissed. This is because a payment made solely for a facility or corporation is not reportable. If you are of sufficient value to them, they may well agree to do so.
Conversely, if you are the little fish in the big case, your attorney should seek to have you dismissed as a provision of a settlement. Sometimes the plaintiff just want to keep you in the case until you testify. Once you are dismissed there is no reporting requirement because only the completed negative results of actions, not just your being named in one, are the reportable events. A plaintiff who can still achieve an acceptable overall settlement and who also has no reason to feel significantly wronged by you personally will not be adverse to this option.
However, be alert for a common mistake that some lawyers make: believing that a high-low agreement is entirely outside the reporting system. Only one of the two results of a high-low agreement is not reportable.
A high-low agreement is a pre-verdict agreement between the sides that if the defendant loses he will not pay more than a maximum (the “high”) but if he wins they will still have to pay a minimum (the “low”). The high-low agreement sets reasonable bookends for how much money will change hands. Without such an agreement, and without these “bookends”, the outcomes may be plaintiff wins nothing -or – the sky’s the limit. The exception to the NPDB reporting requirement only applies if the jury returns a verdict in favor of the defendant. There, the plaintiff will still collect something – but in that case- since there was no liability assessed- the “low” payment is viewed not as the settlement of a claim but as arising from a separate contract and so it is not reportable. However, payment of the “high” value is fully reportable because it is a payment on your behalf to settle a claim, albeit one that was pre-capped.
- State medical board disciplinary actions
No matter how baseless you and your lawyer may believe a matter to be, there is actually no such thing as a “routine” investigation or a “benign” complaint. Once a negative result is reported to the NPDB, the domino effect into your professional associations with hospitals, managed care companies and payors begins.
There are therefore only two possible goals: To make the report never occur by doing an end-run or by winning the matter, or to reduce what is reported even if you lose.
You therefore want a lawyer who will honestly look at the facts of your situation and tell you if you should bail before it is too late to do so. That is because voluntary surrender of your license is often not reportable unless you do so while you are already under investigation or to avoid an investigation beginning. If you are licensed in multiple states but only at risk in one, this is something to consider.
However, if you fight the allegations, then you want the right lawyer.
Your lawyer must be experienced specifically in representing physicians at disciplinary hearings.
These are not conducted like trials under conventional rules of due process and in front of a jury, the defendant has a hand in choosing. They far more resemble a binding arbitration – but one in which all the arbitrators are chosen by your adversary.
However, unlike even arbitration, which itself adopts rules of evidence, there are no such analogues in a disciplinary hearing. In many states there is not even an obligation for lawyers from the Board to reveal exculpatory information to the physician as prosecutors in criminal trials are required to do for defendants.
Given what is at stake, you do not want a trial lawyer who is “learning on the job” in this very different venue.
You want your lawyer to advise you properly as to whether you should take the option, if offered, to be interviewed by the board.
Typically, you will chomping at the bit to tell your story but it is the job of your attorney to hold you back IF you will likely only hurt yourself because you actually do have deficits in personality or communication skills or the matter is just too complicated to explain without being caught up in potentially damaging statements. In those situations it is your attorney’s obligation to keep you back and to proceed by written formal submissions that he drafts (with your help).
Your lawyer must also be aware of collateral proceedings that may occur and be prepared to counteract them. Many states will bring disciplinary charges of their own based on a report received through the NPDB that a physician was disciplined in another state. This literally puts the physician in the position of facing multiple charges and multiple NPDB reports for the same misconduct ruling. Ouch.
You want your lawyer to be alert for this possibility if you are licensed in multiple states and to make sure that only the law of the appropriate state is being enforced against you.
For example, a physician who was disciplined for having lied to a police officer in Texas was then brought in front of the disciplinary committee in New York based on its receipt of a NPDB notification that there had been misconduct finding against him in Texas. However, the lawyer in New York researched the law and found that lying to a cop was not a basis for professional misconduct by a physician in New York and had the New York proceeding dismissed, preventing a second report to the NPDB.
This concludes the first part of this piece. Part 2 will be released in the near future. Don’t miss it.
visit our booking page to schedule a consultation – or use the tool shared below.
“Can Medical Justice solve my problem?” Click here to review recent consultations…
all. Here’s a sample of typical recent consultation discussions…
- Former employee stole patient list. Now a competitor…
- Patient suing doctor in small claims court…
- Just received board complaint…
- Allegations of sexual harassment by employee…
- Patient filed police complaint doctor inappropriately touched her…
- DEA showed up to my office…
- Patient “extorting” me. “Pay me or I’ll slam you online.”
- My carrier wants me to settle. My case is fully defensible…
- My patient is demanding an unwarranted refund…
- How do I safely terminate doctor-patient relationship?
- How to avoid reporting to Data Bank…
- I want my day in court. But don’t want to risk my nest egg…
- Hospital wants to fire me…
- Sham peer review inappropriately limiting privileges…
- Can I safely use stem cells in my practice?
- Patient’s results are not what was expected…
- Just received request for medical records from an attorney…
- Just received notice of intent to sue…
- Just received summons for meritless case…
- Safely responding to negative online reviews…
We challenge you to supply us with a medico-legal obstacle we haven’t seen before. Know you are in good hands. Schedule your consultation below – or click here to visit our booking page.
Learn how Medical Justice can protect you from medico-legal mayhem…
Take Advantage of Our Review Monitoring Service
With eMerit, we help you automate review collection and posting to improve your online reputation.
Consult with a Medico-Legal Expert
Medical Justice Founder and CEO, Jeff Segal, MD, JD and our expert team provide consultations to doctors in need of guidance.
Meet the Experts Driving Medical Justice
Our Executive Team walks with our member doctors until their medico-legal obstacles are resolved.
Jeffrey Segal, MD, JD
Chief Executive Officer and Founder
Dr. Jeffrey Segal, Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Medical Justice, is a board-certified neurosurgeon. Dr. Segal is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons; the American College of Legal Medicine; and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. He is also a member of the North American Spine Society. In the process of conceiving, funding, developing, and growing Medical Justice, Dr. Segal has established himself as one of the country’s leading authorities on medical malpractice issues, counterclaims, and internet-based assaults on reputation.
Dr. Segal was a practicing neurosurgeon for approximately ten years, during which time he also played an active role as a participant on various state-sanctioned medical review panels designed to decrease the incidence of meritless medical malpractice cases.
Dr. Segal holds a M.D. from Baylor College of Medicine, where he also completed a neurosurgical residency. Dr. Segal served as a Spinal Surgery Fellow at The University of South Florida Medical School. He is a member of Phi Beta Kappa as well as the AOA Medical Honor Society. Dr. Segal received his B.A. from the University of Texas and graduated with a J.D. from Concord Law School with highest honors.
In 2000, he co-founded and served as CEO of DarPharma, Inc, a biotechnology company in Chapel Hill, NC, focused on the discovery and development of first-of-class pharmaceuticals for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Dr. Segal is also a partner at Byrd Adatto, a national business and health care law firm. Byrd Adatto was selected as a Best Law Firm in the 2021 edition of the “Best Law Firms” list by U.S. News – Best Lawyers. With decades of combined experience in serving doctors, dentists, and other providers, Byrd Adatto has a national pedigree to address most legal issues that arise in the business and practice of medicine.
Please have the author check this. My understanding about the so called “corporate shield”, that is having your hospital/group settle a claim thus avoiding reporting you personally to the NPDB, as a result of amendments to the reporting law, was ONLY allowable if you are dismissed from the case NOT as a provision or condition of settlement. I have used this mechanism on several occasions.
I am surprised at the number of malpractice defense attorneys for large group practices who are not even aware of this possibility, and thus the number of my colleagues who have been needlessly reported.
And thanks for explaining the ramifications for future licensure. As you know, there are states where all malpractice settlements are essentially re-litigated by boards, thus dramatically compounding the stress of malpractice claims, because this is, at least ostensibly, a jury of peers. They can be oblivious to legal standards, and instead substitute their judgment as to what “should have happened” in a given case.
I have also participated in one employment discrimination case, where an employer did not investigate a databank report until the physician-employee sued for harassment years later, and then used it retrospectively in attempt to justify her firing.
The medical board investigation is long and it involves so many parties that it’ll be nearly impossible for an inexperienced lawyer to keep track of it all. There are upstream factors to consider and many downstream issues.
My own medical board investigation went well in some aspects and really spiraled out of control in other ways. I wouldn’t say my lawyer was inexperienced but the kind of advise I needed had to go beyond the courtroom and the correspondence with the medical board. Without that I had no idea how to clean up my record enough to be able to see patients. To this day it’s been a nightmare getting credentialed with a new medical group.
This isn’t meant to be discouraging. It’s just that few attorneys are experienced in such issues and understand that a physician has licensure in multiple states and has to battle not just the medical board but their online reputation, private insurance groups, the CMS, credentialing committees, and their board certifying bodies.
It gets far more complicated than that once you factor in the reporting requirements. Any agreement I reached with one state or any new investigation which resulted I had to report in a timely manner to all other states. This is all happening while you’re trying to practice medicine and keeping your sanity about you.
Also have faith the the universe looks out for you. For all the crap I’ve dealt with I’ve also learned a lot and my career has actually advanced in some ways. Remember that your knowledge as a physician can never be taken away from you. And if one country or licensing body doesn’t think you deserve to see patients there are others who will fight for you to do so.
Thank you for what you guys do at Med Justice.
Great article. Thank you!