Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Medical Justice

Making healthcare safe for doctors


Blog

Liability in Telemedicine: “Can you sue me now?”

08/12/16 5:00 PM

Notes from a Plaintiff’s Attorney: Liability Issues in Telemedicine

By Dr. JD, a plaintiff’s attorney, practicing in the Northeast

We continue our series of articles penned by one attorney, an MD, JD, giving you a view of the world through a malpractice plaintiff attorney’s eyes. This attorney is a seasoned veteran.  The series includes a number of pearls on how to stay out of harm’s way. While I do not necessarily agree with 100% of the details of every article, I think the messages are salient, on target, and fully relevant.  Please give us your feedback – and let us know if you find the series helpful.

“Telemedicine” is a term that covers any use of electronic communication technology to convey medical information.  It can be as basic as seeking a consultation or as advanced as robotic surgery. Teleradiologists and telepathologists use electronic communication to send radiographs and specimen images for diagnostic or consultation purposes. Pacemakers, electrocardiograms and oxygen saturations can be evaluated electronically by telecardiologists. Computer enhancement assists in the diagnosis and treatment of skin lesions in teledermatology. Electronic stethoscopes can be used to auscultate heart and lung sounds during electronic house calls in tele-home health care. Telepsychiatrists can have therapy sessions with patients who are unable to come to their office. Panels such as tumor boards and ethics committees can tele-conference with specialists.

You will probably eventually be involved somehow in telemedicine, either as a consultant or as a seeker of consultation.  Be aware of the liability issues.

  1. Licensure

(i) Are you exceeding the license granted by your own state?

You can be subject to disciplinary action in your own state if you use your license inappropriately as a predicate to practice telemedicine. So you must determine if your state permits you to act as a telemedicine consultant under your local license to physicians in other states.

(ii) Are you engaging in the unlicensed practice of medicine in other states?

There is no national consensus on what states demand from physicians located outside their borders and are practicing telemedicine affecting their citizens.  Some states demand full licensure, some offer restricted licenses for telemedicine, and some offer licensing by endorsement under reciprocity agreements with neighboring states.

Despite the wide range of options, there is a common thread to keep in mind: if there is a regular, ongoing practice of telemedicine in the state (as opposed to an occasional consultation) the state will want some degree of licensure. A physician who lacks such licensure can be subject to prosecution for the unlicensed practice of medicine.

  1. Insurance coverage

(i) Have you dealt with licensure issues that your carrier requires?

Most malpractice policies specifically exclude coverage for unlicensed activities.

Some states require insurers to cover work that extends beyond state borders and some do not.  Know where your state stands and obtain coverage in any state with patients affected by your consulting if you do not have that protection.

(ii) Does your carrier cover you for telemedicine practice?

Do not assume that just because medical conduct performed in person, such as reading a CT or interpreting an EKG, is covered in your policy that the same work is covered when you do it electronically at a distance. Telemedicine consulting may not be covered by your malpractice insurer and you may need to obtain surplus lines coverage.

  1. Billing

(i) How is billing being handled?

Compliance with payor limitations are critical.  For example, Medicare generally reimburses only for standard consults but will reimburse for teleradiology and EKG and EEG interpretations as well as for telemedicine services to rural areas.

  1. Confidentiality

There is nothing unique to telemedicine in this regard.  The same rules apply to consulting with a physician across the country as apply when consulting with a physician across the room.

What should therefore be borne in mind is the gravity of those issues – that under both HIPAA and state law there is significant potential liability for failing to safeguard protected health information and to maintain safe transmission systems. This applies to both the referring physician and to the telemedicine consultant.

The actual sharing of the confidential medical information in the telemedicine setting is covered under the TPO (treatment, payment, operations) exception in HIPAA and so the patient does not have to specifically authorize it.

Beyond that, ensure that only authorized individuals have access to the information. Even within this group, verify the least number of people necessary to accomplish the work have access. Ensure that the actual transmission process is secure.

If mental health and/or substance abuse issues are addressed, the very strict additional levels of confidentiality that apply to those issues must be respected.

The American Telemedicine Association (ATA) guidelines also specify that both rooms – the one where the requesting physician is and the one where the consulting physician is – be considered as equivalent to patient examination rooms for the purpose of effecting adequate privacy.

Both the consulting physician and the requesting physician must have set protocols to cover confidentiality with regard to their e-medicine activities.

  1. Negligence liability

(i) Can a medical malpractice action be brought in the setting of telemedicine?

Yes.

(ii) Where can the action be brought?

The issue of “forum shopping” comes into play if the doctor provided the telemedicine service in a state different from where the patient lives.

Most jurisdictions will permit a resident to bring a lawsuit where the patient received care or where the defendant physician’s office is located.

Telemedicine obviously expands the scope of venue exposure. The plaintiff can bring the telemedicine consultant into a court in his state.

A state may also require venue.  For example, Montana and North Carolina both require that any medical malpractice claims by their residents that are based on telemedicine must be brought within their state.

A physician who practices in a state with a short Statute of Limitations should not assume that time limit will apply if he is sued for telemedicine consult.

Different states also take different approaches to the Standard of Care.  Some use a national standard and some use a local one. The consulting telemedicine physician should therefore become acquainted with the standards used in the states they extend their practice to.

(iii) What are the potential causes of action?

Any cause of action that can be brought in a standard setting can apply to telemedicine.

The physician who requests the telemedicine consult, as a general rule, is allowed to rely on the telemedicine consultant.  For example, a clinician is not required to have all studies read by a “nighthawk” then re-read. However, just as in face-to-face consulting, the user physician is responsible for choosing a proper source of advice and of implementing any advice appropriately. He can be liable for negligent referral if he had reasonable knowledge that the telemedicine provider was deficient but he continued to use him.

(iv) Are there issues unique to telemedicine?

ATA has guidelines for consideration by any physician expanding into telemedicine.

For example the ATA guidelines note that transmission speed must be optimized and that speeds lower than 384Kbps impede quality. ATA guidelines also discuss the monitor resolutions and specify the need for zoom and pan functions.

In summary: Telemedicine greatly expands the capacity of physicians to consult about their patients but it carries liability pitfalls that both requestors and consultants should understand.

Medical Justice’s thoughts: The rules regarding telemedicine are a mess. Ideally, state medical boards will harmonize their disparate rules into a single set. This would involve creating model state statutes. There, a conference is convened and the interested parties try to define what the rules should be. Then the legislatures votes on adopting the model statute (or the Board of Medicine ratifies the rules). Trying to keep up to date on the rules of 50 states is an impossibly difficult task.


Feeling the pressure? Learn how we can protect you…

We know your time is valuable. Spend a few minutes with us and discover how membership protects what’s important to good medical practice – and does away with what’s detrimental…

Posted by Medical Justice | in Blog | 4 Comments »
newest oldest
Notify of
Thomas Velleff
Guest
Thomas Velleff

Please send additional information
Thank you

retired MD
Guest
retired MD

These rules are a mess. The issue is not settled just by obtaining a license in the state where telemedicine is being provided to. Physicians would not want to have multiple malpractice policies. They might need a policy more typical of locum tenens physicians. But that raises other concerns because that insurance is typically claims made not occurrence policies. So if the policy is no longer in force there is no longer any malpractice coverage and that would require tail insurance coverage to be purchased. Tail coverage could cost 150%-200% of the regular year’s premium. Which legal rules apply in… Read more »

Michael M. Rosenblatt, DPM
Guest
Michael M. Rosenblatt, DPM

Medical Justice and retired MD have it right: Telemedicine is a mess. There are already all kinds of “programs” available for patients to get free advice and find ways to avoid paying you. Now the technology-techs add “telemedicine.” We are all seeing the need to return to the “KISS” method of practicing medicine. A patient sees you in your office or clinic; the patient pays you for that visit. YOU put in the enormous time and effort to learn your profession while the rest of your “young-person” world went skiing, took van trips around the US and back-packing trips through… Read more »

Joe Horton
Guest
Joe Horton

This seems like the perfect opportunity to get a national standard for something medical. If it’s possible to trust the federal government to get something right–a very big IF–this is the venue for it. Since much or most of telemedicine crosses state lines, the proper jurisdiction is clearly federal and not state.

My two cents.