Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Protection.

We protect you against frivolous lawsuits and damage to your good name.

Leadership.

We have the leadership to address the specific medico-legal issues physicians face.

Results.

We provide results our members count on for the health and prosperity of their practices.


Ebola is making a comeback in Africa. Fortunately, the World Health Organization is on top of it. Further, vaccines are being distributed. Hopefully these vaccines will prove safe and efficacious.

Which brings me to Coming Attractions Bride and Formal in Ohio.

“Coming Attractions” went out of business. They sued a Texas Hospital for their economic misfortune.

During an earlier Ebola crisis, this one in the US, a nurse at a Texas Health Resources hospital visited Ohio and tried on wedding dresses at Coming Attractions. This nurse had treated a patient infected with Ebola. The nurse contracted the disease. Note: the nurse tried on the wedding dress during the incubation period. She was not overtly infected while she sized up the dresses.

After the patient’s death, the Hospital assured its nurses they were not at risk for contracting Ebola and “they were free to intermingle with family, friends, and the public at large, despite the nurses’ exposure to the dangerously contagious disease.”

Once this nurse was actually diagnosed with Ebola, Ohio health authorities insisted the store close for disinfection and cleaning.

Fair enough.

When the store re-opened. It was “unable to dispel the perceived Ebola risk and stigma.” The store closed permanently.

Coming Attractions sued the hospital. It alleged the hospital “failed to heed the warnings from the CDC and other health authorities regarding the imminent threat of an Ebola outbreak in the United States and did not provide its nurses with the necessary training, instruction, and protective equipment to prevent the spread of the disease.”

The Hospital moved to dismiss the case arguing Coming Attractions did not provide an expert report to substantiate the claim. The trial court denied the motion. It was appealed.

The appellate court sided with the Hospital.

It held the claim was a health care liability claim and an expert report was required. Coming Attractions’ allegations were “directly related to the provision of health care” and “directly implicate [the Hospital’s] duties as a health care provider.” The safety duties [the Hospital] allegedly violated are not “the types of duties that arise in an ordinary negligence case.”

This case did not conclude that the Hospital was not negligent in its provision of healthcare services. Only that for the case to proceed, Coming Attractions needed to provide an expert report showing how the Hospital deviated from its standard of care.

This case was dismissed with prejudice. Meaning, it’s over.

The case has been sent back to the lower court to determine the Hospital’s reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and costs.

What do you think? Weigh in using the comments box below. And if you haven’t already, subscribe to our newsletter for weekly content.


Feeling the pressure? Learn how we can protect you…

We know your time is valuable. Spend a few minutes with us and discover how membership protects what’s important to good medical practice – and does away with what’s detrimental…

You want to practice good medicine with peace of mind. We want to help.

Contact us to learn how we help.